|
|
|
“There is nothing like looking, if you want to find something. You certainly usually find something, if you look, but it is not always quite the something you were after.”
|
|
— J.R.R. Tolkien
|
LEAD STORIES
|
Federated Searching
Good Ideas Never Die, They Just Change Their Names
By Barbara Quint, Unlimited Priorities team member and editor-in-chief of Information Today's Searcher magazine. Barbara also writes the "Up Front with bq" column in Information Today as well as frequent NewsBreaks on the Infotoday.com website
"I don't want to search! I want to find!!" "Just give me the answer, but make sure it's right and that I'm not missing anything." In a world of end-user searchers, that's what everyone wants, a goal that can explain baldness among information industry professionals and search software engineers. Tearing your hair out isn't good for the scalp.
Read the full article
|
|
|
The DCL Guide to Public Domain DTDs
Today, the multitude of public domain DTDs available for free have provided a convenient alternative to proprietary or custom DTDs. While some are appropriate only for very specific types of documentation, the most common public domain DTDs tend to be more generally applicable. How can you tell which one will best suit your needs? DCL clears up the confusion with this breakdown of the differences between common public domain DTDs.
Read the full article
|
|
OTHER NEWS
-
Tomorrow's Textbooks
- Google, Under the Hood
- A History of Media Tech Scares
- Medical Paper Trail Goes Electronic
- Yahoo Talks Semantics
CONFERENCE BUZZ -
Get all the buzz on the latest conferences, as overheard by DCL
FAVORITES
Popular articles from recent issues
EXTRA
Upcoming conferences
LEAD
STORIES
Federated Searching
Good Ideas Never Die, They Just Change Their Names
March 2010: DCLnews
"I don't want to search! I want to find!!" "Just give me the answer, but make sure it's right and that I'm not missing anything." In a world of end-user searchers, that's what everyone wants, a goal that can explain baldness among information industry professionals and search software engineers. Tearing your hair out isn't good for the scalp.
And, for once, Google can't solve the problem. Well, at least, not all the problems. The Invisible or Dark or Deep Web, whatever you call the areas of the Web where legacy databases reside with interfaces old when the Internet was young, where paywalls and firewalls block the paths to high-quality content, where user authentication precedes any form of access — here lie the sources that end-users may need desperately and that information professionals, whether librarians or IT department staff, work to provide their clients.
The challenge of enabling an end-users searcher community to extract good, complete results from numerous, disparate sources with varying data content, designs, and protocols is nothing new. Even back in the days when only professional searchers accessed online databases, searchers wanted some way to find answers in multiple files without having to slog through each database one at a time. In those days, the solution was called multi-file or cross-file searching, e.g. Dialog OneSearch or files linked via Z39.50 (ANSI/NISO standard for data exchange). As the Internet and its Web took over the online terrain, different names emerged, such as portal searching and — the winner in recent years — federated searching.
Read the full article
The DCL Guide to Public Domain DTDs
March 2010: DCLnews
Simply put, a document type definition (DTD) is a document structure. It defines what elements and attributes are allowed, and sometimes it determines how these elements and attributes are displayed. In other words, a DTD organizes your data and allows your content to be displayed consistently in whatever output medium you choose. A DTD that fits your specific data needs (in terms of both appearance and function) will allow you to take full advantage of all the benefits of XML.
A few years ago, if you needed structured documentation your only option was to create the structure yourself, or else pay a consultant to develop one for you. While making your own DTD may produce a structure customized to your needs, it also requires a lot of knowledge, time, and effort (among other costs). And since every organization marched to its own DTD drummer, there was no hope for exchanging tools or data.
Fortunately, DTDs have come a long way in a short time. Today, the multitude of public DTDs available for free have provided a convenient alternative to proprietary or custom DTDs. While some are appropriate only for very specific types of documentation, the most common public domain DTDs tend to be more generally applicable. How can you tell which one will best suit your needs? DCL aims to clear up the confusion with this breakdown of the differences between common public domain DTDs.
Read the full article
OTHER NEWS
Tomorrow's Textbooks
February 2010: nytimes.com
Macmillan's newest software release lets professors assume the role of author and reorganize, edit, delete, or add content to e-textbooks. DynamicBooks software also supports the integration of multimedia and other course materials. At less than half the price of traditional textbooks, Macmillan is courting students who would otherwise seek out used or even pirated books. But Kindle users will be disappointed — DynamicBooks textbooks can only be read on a laptop or iPhone (though iPad compatibility is reportedly in the works).
Click here to learn more
Google, Under the Hood
February 2010: wired.com
Its name may have been adopted into the popular lexicon as a synonym for "search," but with wolves like Bing and Yahoo at the door, even Google has to stay on its toes. Steven Levy of Wired.com gives readers an intriguing glimpse into the inner workings of Google's pursuit of "the holy grail of search… to understand what the user wants. Then you are not matching words; you are actually trying to match meaning."
Click here to learn more
A History of Media Tech Scares
February 2010: slate.com
Worried about what all this new technology is doing to your brain? You're not alone. In fact, people have been worrying about media overload since the advent of the written word. Internet, television, radio, printed page, and even writing in its most rudimentary form— all have been said to distract and isolate people, and at one time or another, all have been blamed for making society dumber.
Click here to learn more
Medical Paper Trail Goes Electronic
February 2010: nytimes.com
The piles of paper-based patient records appear to be going digital. With $19.2 billion of the economic stimulus going to health information technology, hospitals are ready to make changes and get rid of difficult-to-manage (and not very secure) paper trails. Those making the transition expect the move will improve efficiency and even quality of care.
Click here to learn more
Yahoo Talks Semantics
February 2010: theregister.co.uk
Even Yahoo admits that it can't beat Google search at its own game. But Google doesn't do everything. Using the limitations of the search giant's famous algorithm as a jumping-off point, Yahoo is exploring the potential of the semantic web in its attempt to give Google a little competition.
Click here to learn more
CONFERENCE BUZZ
Overheard at the SDL Innovate Conference
SDL Innovate: Strategies for Delivering Content and Products to Global Markets, Santa Clara, CA, February 9–10, 2010.
Scott Abel of The Content Wrangler reports:
The conference was well attended, with just over 300 participants involved. Presenters from around the globe spoke on structured authoring, the Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA), and component content management. They introduced some very cool global product marketing initiatives as well, including some useful marketing analysis tools that take advantage of both structured and unstructured content to provide a complete view of product marketing and sales.
Mary Laplante of Gilbane Group gave an outstanding presentation that focused on a common problem faced by organizations today: each new information product organizations create (eBooks, iPhone app content, translated documentation) is merely tacked onto the end of an existing inefficient, manual, and error-prone print paradigm-based publishing process.
Mary explained that most organizations are not managing their information assets in the most efficient way possible, and encouraged attendees to break down content silos, adopt content standards, and admit there's a better way of doing things today—especially in a global marketplace, where every productivity gain can help an organization better serve existing customers and find new markets in which to grow its market share.
XML authoring (in particular, DITA) was another hot topic. The sessions on these topics were always full and audience members came with lots of questions about how to get started, how to handle legacy content, and what to do to ensure projects were a big success. The sessions I attended were solid and chocked full of valuable information, although in one or two sessions, the presenters did share a few tidbits of inaccurate information — usually comparing apples (authoring tools) with oranges (content standards).
For example, one presenter said she couldn't imagine doing some task in Adobe FrameMaker, but because she had DITA, now she could. This, of course, makes no sense. FrameMaker is a robust authoring tool that can do far more than a traditional editor (including publishing content without having the nightmare of messing with the DITA Open Toolkit) and it supports DITA. But other than these types of missteps (which were really just minor snafus), the DITA presenters told great stories of success about tight timelines in which fairly major projects were accomplished in very brief time frames.
For further information:
www.sdl.com
thecontentwrangler.com
Overheard at the O'Reilly Tools of Change for Publishing Conference
O'Reilly Tools of Change for Publishing Conference, Marriott Marquis Times Square, New York, NY, February 22–24, 2010
The book publishing industry is going through a transformation, especially with regard to the ways in which content is delivered and purchased. This year, it seems like much of the panic and existential doubts have subsided, and the atmosphere of the conference was more positive. Those present seemed to have accepted that the book publishing industry will not be going extinct—it just has to evolve.
As always, there was much ado about e-books; only this time there were more people looking beyond e-books, which seem to be increasingly viewed as a transitional technology. There is a growing sense of recognition that today's media format du jour may not necessarily have a long shelf life in the good graces of ever-fickle consumers. The solution, of course, is increased flexibility of content. Strategies discussed included the use of content management systems and flexible content formats like XML.
Ray Kurzweil had a fascinating on-stage conversation with Tim O’Reilly about the future of e-books and a new device that he has been developing. They seemed to agree that in many areas, e-books would be making major inroads. It will just take few years. It's interesting to note though that in spite of all the hype, e-book adoption in most areas is still in the single-digits. But it's likely that e-books will continue to catch on; most within the publishing industry predict that e-books will "bloom" sometime in the next few years and their popularity will quickly become widespread.
For further information:
www.toccon.com
Overheard at the DIA Electronic Document Management Conference
23rd Annual DIA Conference for Electronic Document Management: Global Content Management in an Electronic World, National Harbor, MD, February 16–19, 2010
SPL seems to have achieved "maturity" status—at least for the Rx, OTC, Vet, and Vaccine organizations. The panic and confusion over SPL that was apparent a year ago was no longer present, and sponsors (pharma companies, packagers, generic manufacturers, etc.) seemed to be more comfortable with the electronic labeling rules.
While SPL seems to be finally gaining acceptance, its European equivalent, PIM, has been the subject of some debate. Short for the Product Information Management project of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), PIM appears to be in a state of flux, and there is disagreement over just who gets to set the standard. The current timetable calls for the current PIM model to become a mandatory requirement for submitting and reviewing pharmaceutical labels in Europe by 2011. However, some groups feel that the model should first comply with the Health Level 7 (HL7) standard developed by the HL7 organization, an international not-for-profit ANSI-accredited organization that is developing standards for sharing health information.
Electronic signatures and their legal and logistical implications were another topic of interest at the Midwinter Conference. Despite the aviation community having implemented electronic signatures without a hitch, DIA attendees seemed disinclined to embrace them and expressed wariness of potential implementation difficulties.
Finally, there appeared to be a growing awareness of the shift away from electronic documents and toward electronic content, with mentions of fragments, metadata, and data "chunks" making frequent appearances in speakers' presentations.
For further information:
www.fda.gov
www.dclab.com
Overheard at the ALA Midwinter Meeting
ALA Midwinter Meeting, Boston, MA, January 15–19, 2010
DCL representatives were at the American Library Association's Midwinter meeting in Boston, where attendees viewed products newly designed for smartphone and other mobile device platforms. With geo-positioning, not only can users search their own library catalogs, but they can also locate nearby libraries if they are traveling. Compatibility may introduce complications, however; some products work on iPhone, Blackberry, and Android platforms, while others are iPhone only.
Exclusivity was another hot topic. Subscription agency EBSCO's announcement that it would become the exclusive vendor for several major consumer magazines prompted an angry response from educational publishing company Gale, which decried the move. EBSCO responded with a statement that exclusivity helped rather than harmed libraries by diminishing the need to libraries to pay for duplicate content. Still, most librarians seemed unhappy with the practice.
For further information:
exhibitors.ala.org
americanlibrariesmagazine.org
FAVORITES
Popular articles from recent issues
March 2010
Conversion Myths Debunked
http://www.dclab.com/conversion_costs.asp
Preparing Your Documents for Disaster
http://www.dclab.com/document_prep.asp
Keeping Down your Document Conversion Costs
http://www.dclab.com/doc_cost.asp
S1000D: Six MORE Reasons to Consider It for Your TechDocs
http://www.dclab.com/s1000d_reasons2.asp
EXTRA
Upcoming conferences
Don Bridges will be presenting at Content Management Strategies/DITA North America 2010 Conference, April 19–21 2010, Santa Clara, California.
DCL will be represented at the ATA Business Forum, May 17–19, 2010, Seattle, Washington.
|
DCLnews Staff
Publisher:
Mark Gross, President DCL
Editor:
Emily Burns
Data Conversion Laboratory, Inc.
61-18 190th St., 2nd Floor
Fresh Meadows, NY 11365
Telephone: 718-357-8700
Website: www.dclab.com
Editorial: DCLnews@dclab.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
7th National Conference of African American Librarians, August 4–8, 2010 Birmingham, Alabama
Society of American Archivists Annual Meeting, August 10–15, 2010 Washington, D.C.
Nuclear Information Management (NIRMA) Conference, August 15–18, 2010 Summerlin, Nevada
Internet Librarian Conference, October 25–27, 2010 Monterey, California
More Events »
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|