|
INSIGHT INTO
XML
|
NEW
SERIES!
DCLnews talked to leading figures from the world of Scientific,
Technical, & Medical publishing about why STM publishers should
be embracing XML. The answers were illuminating...
This is the second in a series of important interviews.
|
The
Power of XML
Bill
Kasdorf of Impressions Book & Journal Services reveals how
XML has turned fierce publishing competitors into creative collaborators
BILL
KASDORF (pictured) is president and owner of Impressions Book
and Journal Services,
a composition and publishing services firm that specializes
in XML and designs, edits, and produces books and journals in
print and electronic forms. Past President of the Society for
Scholarly Publishing, he is a regular speaker and seminar leader
for SSP, as well as for other publishing-industry organizations
such as the Association of American University Presses, the
Council of Science Editors, and Seybold Seminars.
DCLnews caught up with
him during a break between speaking engagements and asked why
STM publishers should be embracing XML?
"The majority of
them already are and those who aren't should be! In fact, the
STM publishers leading the XML charge are producing some of
the most sophisticated XML around today. They're also establishing
much of the foundation for things that other sectors of publishing
- particularly book publishing - are following."
DCL-NEWS:
STM publishers were early adopters of SGML too...
BILL KASDORF:
"Absolutely.
They were right out in front with SGML. The Majour initiative,
back in the 1980s, for example, was a collaborative effort by
the big STM publishers to create an SGML DTD (Document Type
Definition) for scientific journals. It involved
publishers like Elsevier, Springer, Blackwell, and Wiley, among
others. Because these
publishers dominated the marketplace, they thought that if they
agreed on a standard DTD then all other STM publishers would
be forced to follow it. Well... they did define a header, which
is the bibliographic information at the beginning of a paper...
but they never managed to completely agree on the body tagging,
mainly because they all had different approaches. The Majour
initiative didn't succeed. But it was an attempt at collaboration
between organizations that are fierce competitors. So it was
very positive in that respect. And it led to the environment
we are in today, where competitors are collaborating more and
more."
DCL-NEWS:
CrossRef, the not-for-profit reference linking service, being
a prime example...
"In
the long run, it makes sense to publish academic
journals electronically..."
|
BILL KASDORF:
"Exactly. Many of those same publishers got together and
said: We need to have a way to link to each other's journals,
let's set something up that's publisher neutral and non-profit.
So they set up CrossRef. The fact that they did it
is a milestone achievement. To have that many major competitors
cooperate to create something so constructive and effective
is pretty much a first."
DCL-NEWS:
Why do you think CrossRef has proved so popular in the STM world
- after all, fierce competitors don't suddenly turn altruistic
without good commercial reason?
BILL KASDORF:
"You've got a point there! One reason is pressure from
users. Scientists and researchers simply demand the easy interchange
of their material and the ability to link to each other. Frankly,
if those publishers hadn't come up with a solution, they'd have
been in big trouble.
In the past, academics
who wished to share their research had only one option - they
published their findings in a journal. That was the only way
to get their work known in the wider academic community. But that's
no longer the case. In the sciences, for example, there are
pre-print servers, like the famous one that Ginsparg set up
in high-energy physics. And with the Internet, researchers can
freely exchange their research, bypassing publishing companies.
Publishers have no choice but to pay attention to all this and
work out where they add value in the services they offer."
DCL-NEWS:
Another thing that will affect publishing houses is the publishing
initiatives being set up by libraries. Could you tell us a little
about them?
BILL KASDORF: "The
two that I think are most interesting are the SPARC initiative,
where a group of libraries have banded together to develop publishing
without commercial publishers, and HighWire,
which came out of the Stanford University Library. HighWire
might not be a primary publisher, but they are a major force
in how material gets delivered electronically. Which, again,
is something the commercial publishers have been forced to wake
up to - as most of them now have."
DCL-NEWS:
Do you see a time when electronic formats will replace print
in STM publishing?
BILL KASDORF:
"There are cases now in STM - particularly on the journal
side - where electronic revenues are increasing dramatically
and print revenues are declining. In some cases, that line has
already been crossed and electronic publishing is more profitable
than print. That is clearly the environment where the electronic
will ultimately replace print. But right now many publishers
are burdened with having to do both.
In the long run, it makes
sense to publish academic journals electronically - even if
the intention is for them to get printed remotely. For example, a scientific
journal could be delivered in PDF and printed out article by
article. That way you don't have to bind several thousand copies
of a journal in a central plant and mail them around the world,
which takes weeks or more. Publishing electronically allows
you to publish a lot faster and takes a good deal of the cost
out of the process."
DCL-NEWS:
Distributing content to handheld devices looks set to be the
next big thing?
BILL KASDORF:
"We just did a project called the American Joint Commission
on Cancer. It's basically a clinical cancer reference and is
published in three modes simultaneously: As an 8.5 by 11,
two color, two column manual, which is the main publication;
as a pocket-sized handbook; and electronically for the Palm Pilot
OS. Of course,
XML is what enables this to happen. We created one master XML
file and from that file all three separate presentations were
generated.
One interesting thing
about this project is we did what we call embedded indexing.
In other words, we were able to embed the index information
with the XML. This meant we could automatically generate the
index for each new format as it was re-paginated. Traditionally
you would have to typeset the reference book and then re-index
it to find where the page numbers have shifted to. But if the
indexing is embedded into the XML, the whole thing is automatic.
All in all, it's another example of the sheer power of XML."
NEXT
MONTH we interview another leading figure in the world of XML and
STM publishing - don't miss it!
DCLnews
Editorial
Click
here to read last month's expert STM/XML interview
with Debbie Lapeyre, Vice President of Mulberry
Technologies, Inc
Read
more XML related articles at DCL
Library
Comments
and correspondence to: DCLnews@dclab.com
Return
to top
|