Data Conversion Laboratory, Revolutionizing Publishing for the Digital Age 
  DCLab.com | About DCL | Tech Info | Press Info | Contact Us | DCLNews | Partners | Wiki | Client Area     
menu
Data Conversion Lab

About DCL
  Why go to DCL?
  Clients
  Company Background
  Management
  DCL in the News
  Events
  Holiday Calendar
  Mission

DCL News
  Current Issue
  Back Issues
  Subscribe

Technology
  Technology Resources
  FAQ's
  Glossary
  Presentations
  DCL Work Tracking

Press Info

Clients' Area

Contact DCL
  Directions
  Request Estimate
  Positions

Books2Bytes
Popular Pages
* Current Issue of DCLnews
* DCL featured in The Columbia Guide to Digital Publishing
* Slash Document Costs
* Ann Rockley on ROI in CM
* PDF Resources
* XML Conversion Resources
* Roundtrip Document Conversion
* DCL Resources Library
*

Converting Legacy Data...

*

Aviation & Aerospace

*

PDF Conversion to XML & MS-Word

*

PDF Conversion

*

Quark to XML

* Getting Content into XML
Fact Sheets
* Public Access for Research Materials
* S1000D Conversion
* Content Reuse Assessment
* Document Conversion
* SPL - Pharmaceutical Industry
* Harmonizer™
* Jeppesen Map Revision Service
Technical Papers
* Why STM Publishers Should Use XML...
* Department of Defense and the Power of XML
* Your Data in XML
* SGML to SGML 1
* SGML to SGML 2
* Quark to XML
* Plan Ahead
* Do it Yourself?
* Encyclopedia
Presentations
* Conversion to XML: Documents versus Data (11/2003)
* Data Migration Considerations  (6/2003)
* Technology for Cost-Containment and Efficiency  (4/2003)
* Converting Textbooks to Meet the National XML Standard for Accessibility  (3/2003)
* More Presentations

Publishing for Nothing,
Science for Free

STM Open-access advocates and government committees are lobbying to make scientific literature freely available; publishers want to know how they’ll pay their bills. DCLnews reports.

Why now?

The controversy over making scientific research freely available came about because of the Internet. In the past the cost of logistics and printing were the primary issues. A large publishing infrastructure was necessary to get the job done effectively. But now the Internet and electronic distribution has reduced the dependency on the large infrastructure and "anyone can be a publisher."

But there is still a need to vet the materials and provide a stamp of approval on the quality of the research, which provides a definite added-value over just anyone publishing whatever they want.

Parallels

Parallels to the open access movement can be found in the controversy surrounding open-source software (Linux vs. Microsoft products). While free software is available, and it is suitable for some, Microsoft and other vendors are also going strong. The marketplace is showing that even with free software, there is value being provided by the vendors and it has taken the private companies to provide reliable on-going support.

Government committees in the U.S. and U.K. are taking steps to promote free online access to scientific literature. Not surprisingly, open-access advocates are overjoyed. The Public Library of Science (www.publiclibraryofscience.org/), an open-access publisher, says: “[Government support] and other recent endorsements of open-access publishing amount to a stinging rebuke of the prevailing subscription-based publishing system. Open access is the only acceptable outcome.”

The way open-access works is simple: Publishers charge study authors a printing fee and release information freely. Currently, around 1,200 open-access journals are in existence, up from five in 1992.

It isn’t just government committees who are calling for more open-access journals; scientists are too. Twenty-five Nobel Prize winners joined the open-access fray at the end of August, asking the government to make all taxpayer-funded research papers freely available.

“Science is the measure of the human race’s progress,” the scientists said in a letter to Congress and the National Institutes of Health. “As scientists, and taxpayers too, we therefore object to barriers that hinder, delay or block the spread of scientific knowledge supported by Federal tax dollars - including our own works.”

Those signing the letter included DNA co-discoverer James Watson and former National Institute of Health chief Harold Varmus, a long-time supporter of open-access.

Unfair government intervention

Many publishers are concerned that open access is being forced on them by government intervention, which they see as unfair. “[We don’t] oppose open-access publishing, but only its premature and unwarranted imposition through government mandate,” the Association of American Publishers (www.publishers.org/) said in a statement.

Alan Leshner, chief of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (www.aaas.org/), which publishes Science magazine, takes a slightly different view: “I think all the problems are workable [for the free access publishing plan]. The question is how to do it so we can still pay our bills.”

He adds that the whole discussion of how the scientific community shares research results is a very productive one. “Science is about communicating results to serve society,” he says.

Risky and untried

Science is driven by researchers publishing results to communicate findings, collect funding, and gain tenure. About 25,000 scientific and scholarly journals worldwide publish studies. Most hold copyrights to papers, and charge single-paper access fees as high as $28. Yearly subscription fees rose 226% from 1986 to 2000 and averaged $840 this year.

Who provides the funding?

The federal government funds about 59% of all academic research and development, followed by universities (20%), and state and local government (7.1%), according to the National Research Council.

Those in the open access movement see this as rampant profiteering. “It’s the biggest scam ever,” says 1993 Nobel Prize winner Richard Roberts, who also signed the letter to Congress and the National Institutes of Health. Taxpayers pay for researchers to prepare, review, and edit manuscripts, he goes on, while scientific societies and large publishing firms reap the profits.

Publishers reject this argument. They say the fees are necessary for journals to survive, even for taxpayer-funded studies.

Robert D. Bovenschulte, president of the American Chemical Society’s Publication Division, is one of those unconvinced that open-access is the way ahead: “We see no compelling case to abandon our traditional subscription model for a risky, untried model, which could put our journal publishing program in jeopardy,” he says.

Reasoned step

The biggest player in research funding is the National Institutes of Health (www.nih.gov/). It has a $28 billion budget, making it a focus of the open-access debate. In July, the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee approved a provision recommending that the NIH provide free public access to research articles resulting from NIH-funded research.

The committee called on NIH to offer access to authors' final manuscripts and supplemental materials via PubMed Central (www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/) six months after publication.

Publishers said the provision amounted to a "market intervention." But Rick Johnson, executive director of SPARC (Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition - http://www.arl.org/sparc/), called the proposal "a reasoned, incremental step."

NIH must inform the committee by December 1 how it intends to implement the process. DCLnews will bring more news on the open-access debate as it breaks.

DCLnews Editorial
September 21st, 2004

Resources - The Issues Laid Bare


Setting the Record Straight About Academic Journal Publishing
(From the Professional Scholarly Publishing Group (PSP) at the Association of American Publishers) http://www.pspcentral.org/committees/journals/setting_straight.doc

Open letter to Dr. Elias Zerhouni, Director, NIH from a coalition of PSP publishers,
as well as the cover letters from AAP President & CEO Pat Schroeder to members of the Science Press and members of the Appropriations Sub Committee. Word document (1.1MB): http://www.pspcentral.org/committees/executive/Cover%20Letter%20to%20Journalist.doc (Alternatively, scroll down to the relevant entry in the Resources section at PSP: http://www.pspcentral.org/index.cfm)

See open access in action:
Directory of Open Access Journals http://www.doaj.org

"Why the sci-mag barons are right"
The pro-publisher position in the U.K. Guardian: http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,1194065,00.htm

Read more DCLnews articles about STM publishing:

Why STM publishers should use XML http://www.dclab.com/stm_xml.asp

Free STM content - or not? http://www.dclab.com/freecontent.asp

XML is king, says Jabin White of Elsevier http://www.dclab.com/jabin_white.asp

XML a life-saver for STM publishers, says mark-up expert http://www.dclab.com/xmlangel.asp

Web medicine - BMJ online, a winning move http://www.dclab.com/bmj.asp

  Structured Product Labeling

Content Reuse

Subscribe

Books2Bytes

DCL Library

Columbia Guide
GSA Schedule
AIA Member
DCL Calendar

Best Practices Santa Fe, NM, September 15-17, 2008. More…
XyUser Phoenix, AZ, September 22-24, 2008. More…
9th Annual Vasont Users' Group Meeting, Hershey, PA, October 6-8, 2008. More…

DITA/TECHCOMM 2008, Raleigh, NC, November 3-6 2008. More…

ATA e-Business Europe. Details TBA.

 
Recent News

Doc Train Life Sciences Indianapolis, IN, June 23-25, 2008. More…

X-Pubs London, England, June 22-24, 2008. More…

Mark Logic User San Francisco, CA, June 10-12, 2008. More…

PTC User Long Beach, CA, June 2-4, 2008. More…

Ultramain User Conference 2008, Albuquerque, NM, May 11-15, 2008. More…

Documentation and Training West 2008 Vancouver, BC, May 6-9, 2008. More…

CMS/DITA Santa Clara, CA, April 7-9, 2008. More…

DIA Med Comm Orlando, FL, March 10-11, 2008. More…

DIA EDM Philadelphia, PA, February 5-7, 2008. More…

Gilbane Boston Conference Boston, MA, November 29, 2007. More…

The LavaCon Conference on Advanced Technical Communication and Project Management New Orleans, LA, October 27-30, 2007. More…

2007 ATA e-Business Forum Miami, Florida, Oct 17-19, 2007. More…

DITA 2007™-East, Raleigh, North Carolina, October 4-6, 2007. More…

2007 XyUser Group Fall Conference, Boston, MA, Sept 23-26, 2007. More…

Mark Logic 2007 User Conference, San Francisco, CA, May 15-17, 2007. More…

Content Management Strategies/DITA North America Conference 2007, Boston, MA, March 26-28, 2007. More…

DIA 18th Annual Workshop, San Diego, CA. March 4-7, 2007. More…

DIA 2007 EDM & CDM Conference, Philadelphia, PA, Feb 6 - 8, 2007. More…

DITA 2007 – West, San Jose, CA, February 5-7, 2007. More…

Framemaker 2006 Chautauqua, Austin, TX, Nov 8-10, 2006. More…

PTC/User World Event 2006, Grapevine, TX, June 4-6. More…

19th Annual DIA Conference Philadelphia, PA, February 7-9. More…

XyUser's Conference, San Diego, California, September 11-14. DCL's Don Bridges delivered a presentation on "Content Reuse" More…

Structured Product Labeling, Washington, DC, August 23-24. More…

Tri-XML 2005, Raleigh, NC , July 28. DCL's Don Bridges delivered a presentation on "Content Reuse" More…

Pharmaceutical Labeling and Product Identification, Whippany, NJ, June 16-17. DCL's Don Bridges delivered a presentation on "Structured Product Labeling (SPL) and the Implications of Implementing an XML Solution." More…

More…

Data Conversion Laboratory, Inc.   61-18 190th St., 2nd Floor, Fresh Meadows, NY 11365   718-357-8700   convert@dclab.com

Copyright © 1997-2008  Data Conversion Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved.